tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post2579798831633862981..comments2023-10-16T07:13:12.123-05:00Comments on A plain blog about politics: Read Stuff, You ShouldJonathan Bernsteinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931039630306253241noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-88011469211556320562010-07-26T08:56:00.988-05:002010-07-26T08:56:00.988-05:00I know that writers don't always get to pick t...I know that writers don't always get to pick their headlines, but "The case against Elizabeth Warren" isn't a title I'd choose for a piece that concludes, "I come down on Warren's side." Or rather, after reading the article, I was surprised to see that sentence. His first four paragraphs offer arguments against Warren ... his fifth paragraph is transitional, admitting Warren has appeal but reminding us that the other candidates do as well ... paragraphs six and seven make the case for those other candidates ... #8 says Warren has star power but notes that isn't needed here ... and at the end, he finally comes down on her side, but still finishes that sentence and the column by claiming her proponents are hung up on symbolism. Maybe the title of the column reflects the article, after all.Mon-sewer Paul Regrethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04918972562626522624noreply@blogger.com