tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post8523674191631919147..comments2023-10-16T07:13:12.123-05:00Comments on A plain blog about politics: Could the Supremes Pass On ACA?Jonathan Bernsteinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931039630306253241noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-59668158385402549242011-06-30T14:20:51.126-05:002011-06-30T14:20:51.126-05:00Of course if every circuit affirms and the Supreme...Of course if every circuit affirms and the Supreme Court denies cert in each case, that is tantamount to the Court announcing its decision on the issue. I don't know the odds on that, but it isn't implausible--I personally think it is quite likely a large majority, if not all of the Court, would agree that this is not a matter the courts should be adjudicating.BrianTHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-83282583037192089122011-06-30T10:22:11.770-05:002011-06-30T10:22:11.770-05:00Interesting, and long, take on what could happen i...Interesting, and long, take on what could happen if ACA gets to the Supremes from a law professor of mine: http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/obamacare-and-the-limits-of-judicial-conservatism <br /><br />He's an originalist, and I think that comes across in his piece, but it's still interesting.The Crippes Kinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17989275045906313097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-74379025612796445862011-06-30T10:07:57.715-05:002011-06-30T10:07:57.715-05:00Not with challenges in every circuit being lodged ...Not with challenges in every circuit being lodged with the specific intent of getting a Supreme Court decision.<br /><br />Remember Auric Goldfinger's rules. Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy actionDavis X. Machinahttp://davisxmachina.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com