tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post4322054652806467031..comments2023-10-16T07:13:12.123-05:00Comments on A plain blog about politics: The 2012ers and the Tax Cut DealJonathan Bernsteinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15931039630306253241noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-61919995887447546112010-12-15T09:20:52.040-06:002010-12-15T09:20:52.040-06:00In the Party of No, the obvious vote for a wannabe...In the Party of No, the obvious vote for a wannabe Presidential nominee is to vote against the tax cut deal. After all, you can't go wrong as a Republican always voting the opposite of what that Muslim socialist President Obama wants. You can easily explain your position by referring to unpaid for new spending (i.e. extended unemployment benefits) and tax increases (i.e. the lower than in 2009 estate tax).Ron E.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6926413038778731189.post-10132636466697855572010-12-14T18:36:31.367-06:002010-12-14T18:36:31.367-06:00Ah, but how much do you want to bet that this vote...Ah, but how much do you want to bet that this vote gets included as a vote to raise taxes....REGARDLESS of the direction!<br /><br />In other words, DeMint will end up voting for more taxes when he votes no, according to Palin's ads. And if he votes yes, Huckabee's ads will count that as being for taxes.Matt Jarvisnoreply@blogger.com