Sunday, September 30, 2012
Sunday Question for Conservatives
What topics you would like to see addressed during the debates but suspect will not be raised?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jonathan Bernstein
I'm a political scientist blogging about American politics, especially the presidency, Congress, parties, and elections.
New item alerts and occasional other tweets @jbplainblog
New item alerts and occasional other tweets @jbplainblog
Elsewhere
Ones That I Liked
Impeachment Enter the Contest!
Amend It Another Contest
Hard Boards Politics ain't easy.
Pardon Them On torture.
"Live" Filibuster Give it up, already.
Attack Politics Inevitable.
When Polling Doesn't Help
Hard Boards Politics ain't easy.
Pardon Them On torture.
"Live" Filibuster Give it up, already.
Attack Politics Inevitable.
When Polling Doesn't Help
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(1189)
-
▼
September
(86)
- Friday Baseball Post
- Sunday Question for Liberals
- Sunday Question for Conservatives
- Elsewhere/Housekeeping
- What Mattered This Week?
- Elsewhere: Obama/Bush, Senate Tea Party
- Nixon's the One
- Catch of the Day
- Read Stuff, You Should
- About that Flip to Responsibility....
- Inexplicable -- or Epistemic Closure?
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Elsewhere, and Housekeeping
- The 1980s: A Distant, Distant Era
- Passing (Or Failing) the June Test
- Romney's Tax Flip Towards Responsibility
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Catch of the Day
- A Quick Note on the Necessity of Spin
- Early Voting and Polls/Predictors
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Sunday Question for Liberals
- Sunday Question for Conservatives
- What Mattered This Week?
- Friday Baseball Post
- Representation and Change
- More on Why Romney Goes With Such Weak Stuff
- Read Stuff, You Should
- September 20, 1972
- Late Changes and the Rally Effect
- In a Sane World...
- Hypocrisy and Sequestration
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Beware the Poll Write-Ups!
- Ignore The Electoral College! Follow-Up
- "Fundamentals" Frustration
- Read Stuff, You Should
- L'Shana Tovah (and Housekeeping)
- Sunday Question for Liberals
- Sunday Question for Conservatives
- September 15, 1972
- What Mattered This Week?
- Elsewhere: Romney budget, polling
- Catch of the Day
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Liberal and Conservative Impulses
- Constitutional Goof
- Read Stuff, You Should
- September 12, 1972
- A Much Better Defense of "Dumb" Poll Questions
- Kennedy Center Dishonors (2012 edition)
- Romney and the Rally Effect
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Elsewhere: Obama/Bush, Puzzled GOP
- Party in the Presidency and Mitt Romney
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Elsewhere: Ryan, Bouncing
- Catch of the Day
- Are the 1980s and 1990s Really That Long Ago?
- Ignore (Sort of) Those Polls!
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Sunday Question for Liberals
- Sunday Question for Conservatives
- September 8, 1972
- What Mattered This Week?
- September 7, 1972
- Watching the Conventions
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Democrats Day 3
- Day 3 Preview
- More on No GOP Bill Clinton
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Democrats Day 2
- The Gore-ification of Paul Ryan
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Democrats Day 1
- Public Option? What's That?
- But When He Talked To Me, He Said...
- Read Stuff, You Should
- Monday Movie Post
- Elsewhere, and Looking Back
- Catch of the Day
- Sunday Question for Liberals
- Sunday Question for Conservatives
- What Mattered This Week?
- Friday Baseball Post
-
▼
September
(86)
Posts
IANAC, but since everyone's been getting all constitutional lately, it would be great if they talked about the limits of presidential power and whether the candidates thought presidents exercise too much power in foreign affairs (at the expense of, say, a more functional Congress) or--more crucially, whether they thought the president should be accorded more responsibility over the domestic economic apparatus, since we seem to be blaming the president for all good or ill anyway.
ReplyDeleteWho will be Obama's new Secretary of State.
ReplyDeleteHow will Obama "Change Washington from the inside" during his second term.
Affirmative action, a good issue for Republicans but one they are reluctant to discuss.
ReplyDelete