Thursday, January 26, 2012

Replace Update -- Now With (Perhaps) News!

Sarah Kliff reported yesterday something that this blog has an obligation to note, which is that House Republicans, in particular Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee Chair Joe Pitts, are making noises about producing a "replace" bill this spring as part of their long-promised "repeal and replace" pledge. Since I had a running item for the first half of 2011 focusing on how phony the "replace" portion of that appeared to be, and then gave up on the item since they weren't even bothering to pretend that they were going to move on "replace", I certainly need to pay attention.

And, if they do move a bill, I'll be impressed. But we're not actually there yet. As Kliff reports,the best Pitts can do now is the same rhetorical pieces that Republicans have been touting since 2008. They haven't become a bill and passed the House yet probably  because those things don't really add up to a bill, at least not one that would accomplish the two things they'll probably want to do: match the popular features of ACA, and get a decent score from CBO. At least without including the bits of ACA that people don't like.

So: Pitts claims that a "replace" bill will be introduced "shortly after the Supreme Court rules on the health reform law." We'll see, and we'll see if the bill really does move through the House. I'll give them credit for keeping their promise if it happens. I'm not especially optimistic I'll have to do that.

3 comments:

  1. I predict nothing other than typical Republican BS about HSA's and "allowing insurance companies to sell across state lines" (which is complete crap-- they are already allowed to do that if they get licensed and Obamacare makes it easier; what Republicans want is for all the insurance companies to incorporate in Delaware or South Dakota and be exempted from other states' regulations so they can screw consumers).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just want to go on record now: if the Supreme Court strikes down the ACA, Dems should campaign on a "Medicare For All" option/replacement. Simple, clear, fits on a bumper sticker, everyone knows what it means, and everyone likes Medicare. A winner, yes?

      Delete
    2. Not just that DE, in some of the langauge they were floating around they would allow insurance companies to be in places like american somoa. Like carnival flagging cruise ships in Liberia.

      Delete

Who links to my website?